MOZOM-analyse
Who controls the Ukraine news? The Atlantic information chain behind Western war propaganda

- Source
- NAVO, EU, VS, Erasmus University, EUR-Lex, Tweede Kamer en ANP/NVJ
- MOZOM headline
- Who controls the Ukraine news? The Atlantic information chain behind Western war propaganda
- Original headline
- Research into the information chain behind Western reporting on Ukraine
- Author
- the editorial team
- Date
- 22 augustus 2026 om 14:00
- Subject
- Research into strategic communication, source dependence, media concentration and the political consequences of the Western Ukraine narrative.
Summary of the original report
The Atlantic communication structure behind Ukraine reporting is not a hidden invention. NATO defines strategic communication as influencing perceptions, attitudes and behaviour. Since 2024, the US and Poland have coordinated messages through a Ukraine Communications Group, while the EU works through East StratCom with governments, civil society and media communities. Dutch newspaper research finds a growing new-Cold-War frame focused on rearmament, NATO and European security. This indicates structural influence and convergence, but not direct orders to every newsroom.
What stands out in the reporting
The dominant language usually places Ukraine in a frame of defence, European security and Western solidarity, while Russia appears mainly as a threat, aggressor or source of manipulation. Russia's invasion and international condemnation are factual context, but they do not automatically explain every choice of image, source or wording. When Ukrainian statements become the starting point and counter-perspectives receive limited space, selection and repetition create a propagandistic effect.
The referendum and the treaties
Ukraine is not an EU or NATO member and has no automatic right to European or NATO protection. There are, however, treaty-based cooperation frameworks. The EU Association Agreement entered into force on 1 September 2017 and includes political, economic and security-related cooperation. Ukraine has had a formal NATO partnership charter since 1997; this is not membership and not an Article 5 guarantee. In the 2016 Dutch referendum, 61.1 percent voted against the agreement. The Netherlands later ratified it with an additional declaration. Legally the referendum was consultative. Politically, critics can call this voter betrayal because a clear result did not lead to withdrawal.
Possible message behind the news
A possible political message is that support for Ukraine is organised not only through weapons and money, but also through language, source selection and public image. The key question is not only who is right, but who decides which information feels self-evident.
Neutral conclusion
The Atlantic information chain demonstrably consists of strategic communication, political cooperation, support programmes, official sources and a concentrated media landscape. Structural reinforcement of pro-Ukrainian and anti-Russian frames is plausible and visible in parts. What cannot yet be established is that one secret power directly controls every Western newsroom.
Source:
- NAVO-doctrine AJP-10 over strategische communicatie
- NAVO-steun aan Oekraïne: publieke diplomatie en mediarelaties
- VS en Polen: Ukraine Communications Group
- EU: Strategic Communication Task Forces
- Erasmus University: frame van de nieuwe Koude Oorlog
- Erasmus University: Nederlandse berichtgeving en framing
- Reuters Institute: Nederlandse mediaconcentratie
- ANP-redactiestatuut via NVJ
- EUR-Lex: EU-Oekraïne-associatieovereenkomst
- Europese Raad: aanvullende verklaring na Nederlands referendum
- Tweede Kamer: uitslag referendum associatieverdrag
- NAVO-Oekraïne: Charter on a Distinctive Partnership
- EU-rapport over mediapluralisme in Oekraïne